1. Acker, F., de R. Borges, R.B., Costa, B.: An improved WENO-Z scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 313, 726–753 (2016) 2. Adams, N.A., Shariff, K.: A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127(1), 27–51 (1996) 3. Baeza, A., Burger, R., Mulet, P., Zorio, D.: On the efficient computation of smoothness indicators for a class of WENO reconstructions. J. Sci. Comput. 80(2), 1240–1263 (2019) 4. Bhise, A.A., Samala, R.: An efficient hybrid WENO scheme with a problem independent discontinuity locator. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 91(1), 1–28 (2019) 5. Borges, R., Carmona, M., Costa, B., Don, W.-S.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 227(6), 3191–3211 (2008) 6. Castro, M., Costa, B., Don, W.-S.: High order weighted essentially non-oscillatory WENO-Z schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 230(5), 1766–1792 (2011) 7. Cockburn, B., Shu, C.-W.: TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. II. General framework. Math. Comput. 52(186), 411–435 (1989) 8. Costa, B., Don, W.-S.: Multi-domain hybrid spectral-WENO methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 224(2), 970–991 (2007) 9. Don, W.-S., Gao, Z., Li, P., Wen, X.: Hybrid compact-WENO finite difference scheme with conjugate Fourier shock detection algorithm for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38(2), A691–A711 (2016) 10. Fan, P., Shen, Y., Tian, B., Yang, C.: A new smoothness indicator for improving the weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 269, 329–354 (2014) 11. Fidalgo, J.F., Nogueira, X., Ramirez, L., Colominas, I.: An a posteriori, efficient, high-spectral resolution hybrid finite-difference method for compressible flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 335, 91–127 (2018) 12. Fu, L.: A hybrid method with TENO based discontinuity indicator for hyperbolic conservation laws. Commun. Comput. Phys. 26(4), 973–1007 (2019) 13. Fu, L., Hu, X.Y., Adams, N.A.: A family of high-order targeted ENO schemes for compressible-fluid simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 305, 333–359 (2016) 14. Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.-W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43, 89–112 (2001) 15. Ha, Y., Kim, C.H., Lee, Y.J., Yoon, J.: An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme with a new smoothness indicator. J. Comput. Phys. 232(1), 68–86 (2013) 16. Harten, A.: Adaptive multiresolution schemes for shock computations. J. Comput. Phys. 115(2), 319-338 (1994) 17. Harten, A., Engquist, B., Osher, S., Chakravarthy, S.R.: Uniformly high order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes, iii. J. Comput. Phys. 131(1), 3–47 (1987) 18. Henrick, A.K., Aslam, T.D., Powers, J.M.: Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achieving optimal order near critical points. J. Comput. Phys. 207(2), 542–567 (2005) 19. Jiang, G.-S., Shu, C.-W.: Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126(1), 202–228 (1996) 20. Kim, C.H., Ha, Y., Yoon, J.: Modified non-linear weights for fifth-order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 67(1), 299–323 (2016) 21. Krivodonova, L., Xin, J., Remacle, J.-F., Chevaugeon, N., Flaherty, J.E.: Shock detection and limiting with discontinuous Galerkin methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Appl. Numer. Math. 48(3/4), 323–338 (2004) 22. Lax, P.D., Liu, X.-D.: Solution of two-dimensional Riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19(2), 319–340 (1998) 23. Li, G., Lu, C., Qiu, J.: Hybrid well-balanced WENO schemes with different indicators for shallow water equations. J. Sci. Comput. 51, 527–559 (2012) 24. Li, G., Qiu, J.: Hybrid weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with different indicators. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 8105–8129 (2010) 25. Li, G., Qiu, J.: Hybrid WENO schemes with different indicators on curvilinear grid. Adv. Comput. Math. 40, 747–772 (2014) 26. Liska, R., Wendroff, B.: Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25(3), 995–1017 (2003) 27. Liu, X.-D., Osher, S., Chan, T.: Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115(1), 200–212 (1994) 28. Luo, X., Wu, S.-P.: Improvement of the WENO-Z+ scheme. Comput. Fluids 218, 104855 (2021) 29. Pirozzoli, S.: Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 178(1), 81–117 (2002) 30. Pirozzoli, S.: On the spectral properties of shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 219(2), 489-497 (2006) 31. Qiu, J., Shu, C.-W.: A comparison of troubled-cell indicators for Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods using weighted essentially nonoscillatory limiters. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 27(3), 995–1013 (2005) 32. Ren, Y.-X., Liu, M., Zhang, H.: A characteristic-wise hybrid compact-WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 192(2), 365–386 (2003) 33. Sedov, L.I., Friedman, M., Street, R.E.: Similarity and dimensional methods in mechanics. Phys. Today 13(9), 50–52 (2009) 34. Shi, J., Zhang, Y.-T., Shu, C.-W.: Resolution of high order WENO schemes for complicated flow structures. J. Comput. Phys. 186(2), 690–696 (2003) 35. Shu, C.-W.: High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated problems. SIAM Rev. 51(1), 82–126 (2009) 36. Shu, C.-W., Osher, S.: Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83(1), 32–78 (1989) 37. Sun, Z., Wang, S., Chang, L.-B., Xing, Y., Xiu, D.: Convolution neural network shock detector for numerical solution of conservation laws. Commun. Comput. Phys. 28(5), 2075–2108 (2020) 38. Suresh, A., Huynth, H.: Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping. J. Comput. Phys. 136(1), 83–99 (1997) 39. Wang, B.S., Don, W.-S., Gao, Z., Wang, Y.H., Wen, X.: Hybrid compact-WENO finite difference scheme with radial basis function based shock detection method for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40(6), A3699–A3714 (2018) 40. Wen, X., Don, W.-S., Gao, Z., Hesthaven, J.S.: An edge detector based on artificial neural network with application to hybrid Compact-WENO finite difference scheme. J. Sci. Comput. 83, 49 (2020) 41. Woodward, P., Colella, P.: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54(1), 115–173 (1984) 42. Yamaleev, N.K., Carpenter, M.H.: A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 228(11), 4248–4272 (2009) 43. Yamaleev, N.K., Carpenter, M.H.: Third-order energy stable WENO scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 228(8), 3025–3047 (2009) 44. Zhang, S., Zhu, J., Shu, C.-W.: A brief review on the convergence to steady state solutions of Euler equations with high-order WENO schemes. Adv. Aerodyn. 1(1), 1–25 (2019) 45. Zhao, Z., Chen, Y., Qiu, J.: A hybrid Hermite WENO scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 405, 109175 (2020) 46. Zhao, Z., Zhu, J., Chen, Y., Qiu, J.: A new hybrid WENO scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. Comput. Fluids 179, 422–436 (2019) 47. Zhu, H., Qiu, J.: Adaptive Runge-Kutta discontinuous Galerkin methods using different indicators: one-dimensional case. J. Comput. Phys. 228(18), 6957–6976 (2009) 48. Zhu, J., Qiu, J.: A new fifth order finite difference WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 318, 110–121 (2016) 49. Zhu, J., Shu, C.-W.: A new type of multi-resolution WENO schemes with increasingly higher order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 659–683 (2018) |