Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation >

2024 , Vol. 6 >Issue 3: 2011 - 2044

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-024-00392-z

ORIGINAL PAPERS

New High-Order Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Systems of Nonlinear PDEs with Uncertainties

Expand
  • 1 Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA;
    2 Department of Mathematics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany;
    3 Department of Mathematics, Shenzhen International Center for Mathematics, and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Science and Material Design, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China;
    4 Institute of Mathematics, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Received date: 2023-12-12

  Revised date: 2024-02-19

  Accepted date: 2024-02-20

  Online published: 2024-12-20

Supported by

The work of A. Chertock was supported in part by the NSF grant DMS-2208438. The work of M. Herty was supported in part by the DFG (German Research Foundation) through 20021702/GRK2326, 333849990/IRTG-2379, HE5386/ 18-1, 19-2, 22-1, 23-1, and under Germany’s Excellence Strategy EXC-2023 Internet of Production 390621612. The work of A. Kurganov was supported in part by the NSFC grant 12171226 and the fund of the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Computational Science and Material Design, China (No. 2019B030301001). The work of M. Lukáčová-Medvid’ová has been funded by the DFG under the SFB/TRR 146 Multiscale Simulation Methods for Soft Matter Systems. M. Lukáčová-Medvid’ová gratefully acknowledges the support of the Gutenberg Research College of University Mainz and the Mainz Institute of Multiscale Modeling. A. Chertock and A. S. Iskhakov also acknowledge the support of the LeRoy B. Martin, Jr. Distinguished Professorship Foundation. M. Herty and M. Lukáčová- Medvid’ová also acknowledge the support of the DFG through the project 525853336 funded within the Focused Programme SPP 2410 “Hypebrolic Balance Laws: Complexity, Scales and Randomness”.

Fold

Abstract

In this paper, we develop new high-order numerical methods for hyperbolic systems of nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs) with uncertainties. The new approach is realized in the semi-discrete finite-volume framework and is based on fifth-order weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) interpolations in (multidimensional) random space combined with second-order piecewise linear reconstruction in physical space. Compared with spectral approximations in the random space, the presented methods are essentially non-oscillatory as they do not suffer from the Gibbs phenomenon while still achieving high-order accuracy. The new methods are tested on a number of numerical examples for both the Euler equations of gas dynamics and the Saint-Venant system of shallow-water equations. In the latter case, the methods are also proven to be well-balanced and positivity-preserving.

Key words： Hyperbolic conservation and balance laws with uncertainties; Finite-volume methods; Central-upwind schemes; Weighted essentially non-oscillatory (WENO) interpolations

Cite this article

Alina Chertock, Michael Herty, Arsen S. Iskhakov, Safa Janajra, Alexander Kurganov, Mária Lukáčová-Medvid'ová . New High-Order Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Systems of Nonlinear PDEs with Uncertainties[J]. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2024 , 6(3) : 2011 -2044 . DOI: 10.1007/s42967-024-00392-z

References

1. Abgrall, R., Congedo, P.M.: A semi-intrusive deterministic approach to uncertainty quantification in non-linear fluid flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 235, 828–845 (2013)
2. Abgrall, R., Mishra, S.: Uncertainty quantification for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. In: Abgrall, R., Shu, C.W. (eds.) Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, vol. 18, pp. 507–544. Handbook of Numerical Analysis. Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam (2017)
3. Abgrall, R., Tokareva, S.: The stochastic finite volume method. In: Shi, J., Lorenzo, P., (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification for Hyperbolic and Kinetic Equations, vol. 14, pp. 1–57. SEMA SIMAI Springer Series. Springer, Cham (2017)
4. Barth, T.: Non-intrusive uncertainty propagation with error bounds for conservation laws containing discontinuities. In: Hester, B., Didier, L., Siddhartha, M., Christoph, S. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 92, pp. 1–57. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
5. Bollermann, A., Noelle, S., Lukáčová-Medviďová, M.: Finite volume evolution Galerkin methods for the shallow water equations with dry beds. Commun. Comput. Phys. 10, 371–404 (2011)
6. Chorin, A.J.: Gaussian fields and random flow. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 21–32 (1974)
7. Dai, D., Epshteyn, Y., Narayan, A.: Hyperbolicity-preserving and well-balanced stochastic Galerkin method for shallow water equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 43, A929–A952 (2021)
8. Dai, D., Epshteyn, Y., Narayan, A.: Hyperbolicity-preserving and well-balanced stochastic Galerkin method for two-dimensional shallow water equations. J. Comput. Phys. 452, 110901 (2022)
9. Després, B., Poëtte, G., Lucor, D.: Robust uncertainty propagation in systems of conservation laws with the entropy closure method. In: Hester, B., Didier, L., Siddhartha, M., Christoph, S. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics. vol. 92, pp. 105–149. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
10. Ditkowski, A., Fibich, G., Sagiv, A.: Density estimation in uncertainty propagation problems using a surrogate model. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. 8, 261–300 (2020)
11. Don, W.S., Li, D.-M., Gao, Z., Wang, B.-S.: A characteristic-wise alternative WENO-Z finite difference scheme for solving the compressible multicomponent non-reactive flows in the overestimated quasiconservative form. J. Sci. Comput. 82, 27 (2020)
12. Don, W.S., Li, R., Wang, B.-S., Wang, Y.H.: A novel and robust scale-invariant WENO scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 448, 110724 (2022)
13. Dürrwächter, J., Kuhn, T., Meyer, F., Schlachter, L., Schneider, F.: A hyperbolicity-preserving discontinuous stochastic Galerkin scheme for uncertain hyperbolic systems of equations. J. Comput. Appl. Math.370, 112602 (2020)
14. Geraci, G., Congedo, P.M., Abgrall, R., Iaccarino, G.: A novel weakly-intrusive non-linear multiresolution framework for uncertainty quantification in hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Sci. Comput. 66, 358–405 (2016)
15. Gerster, S., Herty, M.: Entropies and symmetrization of hyperbolic stochastic Galerkin formulations. Commun. Comput. Phys. 27, 639–671 (2020)
16. Gerster, S., Herty, M., Iacomini, E.: Stability analysis of a hyperbolic stochastic Galerkin formulation for the Aw-Rascle-Zhang model with relaxation. Math. Biosci. Eng. 18, 4372–4389 (2021)
17. Gerster, S., Herty, M., Sikstel, A.: Hyperbolic stochastic Galerkin formulation for the p-system. J. Comput. Phys. 395, 186–204 (2019)
18. Gottlieb, S., Ketcheson, D., Shu, C.-W.: Strong Stability Preserving Runge-Kutta and Multistep Time Discretizations. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Hackensack (2011)
19. Gottlieb, S., Shu, C.-W., Tadmor, E.: Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43, 89–112 (2001)
20. Jakeman, J., Archibald, R., Xiu, D.: Characterization of discontinuities in high-dimensional stochastic problems on adaptive sparse grids. J. Comput. Phys. 230, 3977–3997 (2011)
21. Jiang, Y., Shu, C.-W., Zhang, M.: An alternative formulation of finite difference weighted ENO schemes with Lax-Wendroff time discretization for conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35, A1137–A1160 (2013)
22. Jin, S., Shu, R.: A study of hyperbolicity of kinetic stochastic Galerkin system for the isentropic Euler equations with uncertainty. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 40, 765–780 (2019)
23. Kurganov, A., Noelle, S., Petrova, G.: Semidiscrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 707–740 (2001)
24. Kurganov, A., Petrova, G.: A second-order well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for the Saint-Venant system. Commun. Math. Sci. 5, 133–160 (2007)
25. Kurganov, A., Tadmor, E.: Solution of two-dimensional riemann problems for gas dynamics without Riemann problem solvers. Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations 18, 584–608 (2002)
26. Le Maître, O. P., Knio, O. M.: Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification. Springer, New York(2010)
27. Le Maître, O.P., Knio, O.M., Najm, H.N., Ghanem, R.G.: Uncertainty propagation using Wiener-Haar expansions. J. Comput. Phys. 197, 28–57 (2004)
28. Li, P., Li, T.T., Don, W.S., Wang, B.-S.: Scale-invariant multi-resolution alternative WENO scheme for the Euler equations. J. Sci. Comput. 94, 15 (2023)
29. Lie, K.-A., Noelle, S.: On the artificial compression method for second-order nonoscillatory central difference schemes for systems of conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 1157–1174 (2003)
30. Liu, H.: A numerical study of the performance of alternative weighted ENO methods based on various numerical fluxes for conservation law. Appl. Math. Comput. 296, 182–197 (2017)
31. Mishra, S., Schwab, C.: Sparse tensor multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with random initial data. Math. Comp. 81, 1979–2018 (2012)
32. Mishra, S., Schwab, C.: Monte-Carlo finite-volume methods in uncertainty quantification for hyperbolic conservation laws. In: Shi, J., Lorenzo, P. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification for Hyperbolic and Kinetic Equations, vol. 14, pp. 231–277. SEMA SIMAI Springer Series. Springer, Cham (2017)
33. Mishra, S., Schwab, C., Šukys, J.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume methods for nonlinear systems of conservation laws in multi-dimensions. J. Comput. Phys. 231, 3365–3388 (2012)
34. Mishra, S., Schwab, C., Šukys, J.: Multilevel Monte Carlo finite volume methods for shallow water equations with uncertain topography in multi-dimensions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34, B761–B784 (2012)
35. Mishra, S., Schwab, C., Šukys, J.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite volume methods for uncertainty quantification in nonlinear systems of balance laws. In: Hester, B., Didier, L., Siddhartha, M., Christoph, S. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Fluid Dynamics, vol. 92, pp. 225–294. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
36. Nessyahu, H., Tadmor, E.: Nonoscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87, 408–463 (1990)
37. Petrella, M., Tokareva, S., Toro, E.F.: Uncertainty quantification methodology for hyperbolic systems with application to blood flow in arteries. J. Comput. Phys. 386, 405–427 (2019)
38. Pettersson, M.P., Iaccarino, G., Nordström, J.: A stochastic Galerkin method for the Euler equations with Roe variable transformation. J. Comput. Phys. 257, 481–500 (2014)
39. Pettersson, M.P., Iaccarino, G., Nordström, J.: Polynomial Chaos Methods for Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations. Numerical Techniques for Fluid Dynamics Problems in the Presence of Uncertainties. Springer, Cham (2015)
40. Poëtte, G., Després, B., Lucor, D.: Uncertainty quantification for systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 2443–2467 (2009)
41. Schlachter, L., Schneider, F.: A hyperbolicity-preserving stochastic Galerkin approximation for uncertain hyperbolic systems of equations. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 80–98 (2018)
42. Shi, J., Hu, C., Shu, C.-W.: A technique of treating negative weights in WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 175, 108–127 (2002)
43. Šukys, J., Mishra, S., Schwab, C.: Multi-level Monte Carlo finite difference and finite volume methods for stochastic linear hyperbolic systems. In: Josef, D., Frances, Y. K., Gareth, W. P., Ian, H. S. (eds.) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2012, vol. 65, pp. 649–666. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
44. Sweby, P.K.: High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21, 995–1011 (1984)
45. Tang, T., Zhou, T.: Convergence analysis for stochastic collocation methods to scalar hyperbolic equations with a random wave speed. Commun. Comput. Phys. 8, 226–248 (2010)
46. Tokareva, S., Zlotnik, A., Gyrya, V.: Stochastic finite volume method for uncertainty quantification of transient flow in gas pipeline networks. Appl. Math. Model. 125, 66–84 (2024)
47. Tryoen, J., Le Maître, O., Ndjinga, M., Ern, A.: Intrusive Galerkin methods with upwinding for uncertain nonlinear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 229, 6485–6511 (2010)
48. Tryoen, J., Le Maitre, O., Ndjinga, M., Ern, A.: Roe solver with entropy corrector for uncertain hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, 491–506 (2010)
49. Wan, X., Karniadakis, G.E.: Multi-element generalized polynomial chaos for arbitrary probability measures. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28, 901–928 (2006)
50. Wang, B.-S., Don, W.S.: Affine-invariant WENO weights and operator. Appl. Numer. Math. 181, 630–646 (2022)
51. Wang, B.-S., Li, P., Gao, Z., Don, W.S.: An improved fifth order alternative WENO-Z finite difference scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 374, 469–477 (2018)
52. Wu, K., Tang, H., Xiu, D.: A stochastic Galerkin method for first-order quasilinear hyperbolic systems with uncertainty. J. Comput. Phys. 345, 224–244 (2017)
53. Wu, K., Xiu, D., Zhong, X.: A WENO-based stochastic Galerkin scheme for ideal MHD equations with random inputs. Commun. Comput. Phys. 30, 423–447 (2021)
54. Xiu, D.: Efficient collocational approach for parametric uncertainty analysis. Commun. Comput. Phys. 2, 293–309 (2007)
55. Xiu, D.: Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: a review. Commun. Comput. Phys. 5, 242–272 (2009)
56. Xiu, D.: Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations. A Spectral Method Approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)
57. Zhong, X., Shu, C.-W.: Entropy stable Galerkin methods with suitable quadrature rules for hyperbolicsystems with random inputs. J. Sci. Comput. 92, 14 (2022)
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Copyright © Editorial By Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation
沪ICP备09014157