Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation >

2024 , Vol. 6 >Issue 3: 1779 - 1800

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42967-023-00308-3

ORIGINAL PAPERS

Projection-Based Dimensional Reduction of Adaptively Refined Nonlinear Models

Expand
  • 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, USA;
    2 Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Stanford University, Stanford, USA;
    3 Institute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, USA

Received date: 2023-02-21

  Revised date: 2023-06-30

  Accepted date: 2023-08-15

  Online published: 2024-12-20

Fold

Abstract

Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) is fairly practiced in the context of high-dimensional, mesh-based computational models. However, it is in its infancy in that of low-dimensional, generalized-coordinate-based computational models such as projection-based reducedorder models. This paper presents a complete framework for projection-based model order reduction (PMOR) of nonlinear problems in the presence of AMR that builds on elements from existing methods and augments them with critical new contributions. In particular, it proposes an analytical algorithm for computing a pseudo-meshless inner product between adapted solution snapshots for the purpose of clustering and PMOR. It exploits hyperreduction—specifically, the energy-conserving sampling and weighting hyperreduction method—to deliver for nonlinear and/or parametric problems the desired computational gains. Most importantly, the proposed framework for PMOR in the presence of AMR capitalizes on the concept of state-local reduced-order bases to make the most of the notion of a supermesh, while achieving computational tractability. Its features are illustrated with CFD applications grounded in AMR and its significance is demonstrated by the reported wallclock speedup factors.

Key words： Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR); Computational fluid dynamics; Energyconserving sampling and weighting (ECSW); Model order reduction; Reduced-order model; Supermesh

Cite this article

Clayton Little, Charbel Farhat . Projection-Based Dimensional Reduction of Adaptively Refined Nonlinear Models[J]. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2024 , 6(3) : 1779 -1800 . DOI: 10.1007/s42967-023-00308-3

References

1. Amsallem, D., Zahr, M.J., Farhat, C.: Nonlinear model order reduction based on local reduced-order bases. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 92(10), 891–916 (2012). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ nme. 4371
2. Bank, R.E., Sherman, A.H.: An adaptive, multi-level method for elliptic boundary value problems. Computing 26(2), 91–105 (1981)
3. Barnett, J., Farhat, C.: Quadratic approximation manifold for mitigating the Kolmogorov barrier in nonlinear projection-based model order reduction. J. Comput. Phys. 464(111), 348 (2022). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jcp. 2022. 111348
4. Borker, R., Huang, D., Grimberg, S., Farhat, C., Avery, P., Rabinovitch, J.B.R.: Mesh adaptation framework for embedded boundary methods for computational fluid dynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 90(8), 389–424 (2019)
5. Carlberg, K., Bou-Mosleh, C., Farhat, C.: Efficient non-linear model reduction via a least-squares Petrov-Galerkin projection and compressive tensor approximations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 86(2), 155–181 (2011)
6. Carlberg, K., Farhat, C., Cortial, J., Amsallem, D.I.: The GNAT method for nonlinear model reduction: effective implementation and application to computational fluid dynamics and turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 242, 623–647 (2013)
7. Chaturantabut, S., Sorensen, D.C.: Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(5), 2737–2764 (2010)
8. Eftang, J.L., Patera, A.T., Rønquist, E.M.: An hp certified reduced basis method for parametrized elliptic partial differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32(6), 3170–3200 (2010). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1137/ 09078 0122
9. Elkan, C.: Using the triangle inequality to accelerate K-means. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning. AAAI Press, ICML 2003, pp. 147–153 (2003)
10. Farhat, C., Avery, P., Chapman, T., Cortial, J.: Dimensional reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models with finite rotations and energy-based mesh sampling and weighting for computational efficiency. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 98(9), 625–662 (2014). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1002/ nme. 4668
11. Farhat, C., Chapman, T., Avery, P.: Structure-preserving, stability, and accuracy properties of the energy-conserving sampling and weighting method for the hyper reduction of nonlinear finite element dynamic models. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 102(5), 1077–1110 (2015)
12. Farhat, C., Geuzaine, P., Brown, G.: Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Comput. Fluids 32(1), 3–29 (2003)
13. Farhat, C., Grimberg, S., Manzoni, A., et al.: Computational bottlenecks for PROMs: pre-computation and hyperreduction. In: Benner, P., Grivet-Talocia, S., Quarteroni, A., et al. (eds.) Model Order Reduction - Volume 2: Snapshot-Based Methods and Algorithms. De Gruyter, Berlin, chap. 5, pp. 181–244 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1515/ 97831 10671 490- 005
14. Farhat Research Group: Aero-F (2022). frg. bitbu cket. io
15. Farrell, P., Maddison, J.: Conservative interpolation between volume meshes by local Galerkin projection. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 200(1/2/3/4), 89–100 (2011)
16. Geuzaine, P., Brown, G., Harris, C., Farhat, C.: Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F-16 configuration for various flight conditions. AIAA J. 41(3), 363–371 (2003)
17. Gräßle, C., Hinze, M.: POD reduced order modeling for evolution equations utilizing arbitrary finite element discretizations. Adv. Comput. Math. 44(6), 1941–1978 (2018). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s10444- 018- 9620-x
18. Grimberg, S., Farhat, C., Tezaur, R., Bou-Mosleh, C.: Mesh sampling and weighting for the hyperreduction of nonlinear Petrov-Galerkin reduced-order models with local reduced-order bases. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 122(7), 1846–1874 (2021)
19. Grimberg, S., Farhat, C., Youkilis, N.: On the stability of projection-based model order reduction for convection-dominated laminar and turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 419(109), 681 (2020). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jcp. 2020. 109681
20. Haasdonk, B., Ohlberger, M.: Reduced basis method for finite volume approximations of parametrized linear evolution equations. ESAIM: Math. Model. Num. Anal. 42(2), 277–302 (2008)
21. Huang, W.: Mathematical principles of anisotropic mesh adaptation. Commun. Comput. Phys. 1(2), 276–310 (2006)
22. Jiao, X., Heath, M.T.: Common-refinement-based data transfer between non-matching meshes in multiphysics simulations. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 61(14), 2402–2427 (2004)
23. Leutenegger, S.T., Lopez, M.A., Edgington, J.: STR: a simple and efficient algorithm for R-tree packing. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Data Engineering, IEEE, pp. 497–506 (1997)
24. Mitchell, W.F.: Unified multilevel adaptive finite element methods for elliptic problems. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1988)
25. Remacle, J.F., Li, X., Shephard, M.S., Flaherty, J.E.: Anisotropic adaptive simulation of transient flows using discontinuous Galerkin methods. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 62(7), 899–923 (2005)
26. Schmidt, A., Siebert, K.G.: ALBERT: an adaptive hierarchical finite element toolbox. Albert-LudwigsUniv., Math. Fak. (2000)
27. Ullmann, S., Rotkvic, M., Lang, J.: POD-Galerkin reduced-order modeling with adaptive finite element snapshots. J. Comput. Phys. 325, 244–258 (2016). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jcp. 2016. 08. 018
28. Yano, M.: A minimum-residual mixed reduced basis method: exact residual certification and simultaneous finite-element reduced-basis refinement. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 50(1), 163–185 (2016). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1051/ m2an/ 20150 39
29. Yano, M.: A reduced basis method for coercive equations with an exact solution certificate and spatioparameter adaptivity: energy-norm and output error bounds. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40(1), A388–A420 (2018). https:// doi. org/ 10. 1137/ 16M10 71341
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉

Copyright © Editorial By Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation
沪ICP备09014157